• Guest, pentru o varianta fara reclame a forumului oferim conturi premium. Mai multe detalii aici.

AM

Active Member
Feb 13, 2012
531
192
43
36
Cluj Napoca
#3
Cam dezorientati americanii astia. Acum cateva zile si un C17 a aterizat pe un aeroport din asta micut.
 

Ovidiu Veres

Well-Known Member
Mar 29, 2012
798
635
93
37
Cluj-Napoca
#4
Bun. Sa zicem ca mi-as dori si eu o eroare din asta pe LRCL din toti rarunchii. Dar n-ar fi ok pentru multa lume.
Si totusi, eroarea care a fost? Citirea gresita a hartilor? Nu era trecuta destinatia exacta in computer? Turnul nu stia care sunt limitele pistei? Parca prea multe neintelegeri...
 

Zsolt

King Nothing
Staff member
fly-ra 2017
Feb 12, 2012
6,658
2,171
113
39
EDDK
flightradar24 feed id
My fr24 statistics
flightaware feed
My flightaware feed
Flightdiary
My fr24 profile
#5
C17-le a "aterizat gresit" in Ianuarie, dar abia acum l-au descoperit Romanii de pe Facebook, si au dat share la link intr-o veselie.
Ovidiu, in US sunt multe aeroporturi la distanta mica, iar daca nu esti atent la charturi (unde scrie "do not mistake with XXXX"), ai sanse sa il pui chiar si pe autostrada.
Asta se intampla cand vii visual, ca doar ILSul te-ar aduce totusi acasa.
 

Ovidiu Veres

Well-Known Member
Mar 29, 2012
798
635
93
37
Cluj-Napoca
#6
Deci problema e ca echipajul n-a citit cu atentie o harta, da?
ATC-ul n-ar trebui sa-i avertizeze ca balena nu incape in miniatura lor de aeroport?

Si, mai departe, avand in vedere ca nu prea are sanse de decolare safe de-acolo, what's next?
 

Zsolt

King Nothing
Staff member
fly-ra 2017
Feb 12, 2012
6,658
2,171
113
39
EDDK
flightradar24 feed id
My fr24 statistics
flightaware feed
My flightaware feed
Flightdiary
My fr24 profile
#7
Ovidiu, cand primesti visual approach, raportezi "Runway in sight", iar ATCul iti da liber la aterizare. El crede ca tu (pilotul) esti destul de clar la cap, si vezi aeroportul care trebuie.
Este o alta regula, ca turnul trebuie sa mentina contact vizual (in cazul in care conditiile le permit) cu aeronava care este pe finala, deci putea sa il avertizeze ca nu vine spre el, ci catre alt aeroport.

Dupa cum vezi aici, Jabara Airport e la Nord de McConnell Air Force Base, insa pistele sunt aprox pe aceeasi directie. Deci clar ca se poate incurca.

Legat de plecare, va pleca cu siguranta, dar gol. Il golesc, marfa merge pe sosea pana la McConnecl AFB, iar aeronava va pleca goala.
Lungimea pistei este de 1860, detalii pe Skyvector.

Mai ai nelamuriri?, shoot, intreaba.
 

Ovidiu Veres

Well-Known Member
Mar 29, 2012
798
635
93
37
Cluj-Napoca
#8
Nope, mersi, am inteles pe de-a-ntregul situatia.
Intreb pentru ca imi place sa inteleg intregul tablou al situatiei, nu numai "can-can"-ul dintr-o stire. De genul "Marea aeronava pe micul aerodrom", bine, bine, dar care sunt cauzele si consecintele, ca incerc sa nu fac parte din publicul larg.
Repet, mersi pentru detalierea problemei ;)
 

Zsolt

King Nothing
Staff member
fly-ra 2017
Feb 12, 2012
6,658
2,171
113
39
EDDK
flightradar24 feed id
My fr24 statistics
flightaware feed
My flightaware feed
Flightdiary
My fr24 profile
#9
Si inca ceva, intre cele doua aeroporturi se afla si Beech Airport, fabrica Beechcraft :) Puteau sa se aseze si acolo.
 

witze

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
Feb 13, 2012
1,668
965
113
41
Wuppertal
www.planepictures.ro
Flugstatistik / Flightmemory
[IMG]
#10
Ce soc pentru piloti...sa te astepti sa ai o pista de 3658 de m si sa realizezi in ultimul moment ca pista pe care coboara e de doar la nici jumatate lungime...cred ca au franat brutal. Bine ca au aterizat safe!
 

Zsolt

King Nothing
Staff member
fly-ra 2017
Feb 12, 2012
6,658
2,171
113
39
EDDK
flightradar24 feed id
My fr24 statistics
flightaware feed
My flightaware feed
Flightdiary
My fr24 profile
#11


Partea interesanta a chartului, sunt 3 aeroporturi, in afara de AFB, pe care putea sa se aseze :)
 

AIR06

Moderator
Staff member
fly-ra 2017
Apr 20, 2012
2,754
1,222
113
Constanta
#14
Altii care " au gresit" aeroportul : :)
A Vietjet Air Airbus A320-200, registration VN-A692 performing flight VJ-8861 from Hanoi to Dalat (Vietnam) with nearly 200 passengers, departed Hanoi at about 17:10L (scheduled departure from gate at 15:45L) transponding callsign VJC8575 and landed at Nha Trang's Cam Ranh Airport (Vietnam), about 55nm northeast of Dalat, at about 19:00L (12:00Z) following what appeared to be an uneventful flight.

Passengers reported they were astonished as they could not recognize the airport as their home airport after landing until they discovered they were put down about 140km from their home town. No announcements had been made by the crew, that the aircraft was being diverted.

In the meantime Vietjet's flight VJ-8575 (callsign VJC8575) from Hanoi to Nha Trang with scheduled departure at 16:35L did not depart from Hanoi despite past scheduled departure time, the nearly 200 passengers were waiting for departure in the departure lounge.
Vietnam's Authorities opened an investigation into what appears to be a serious error and required Vietjet to explain the occurrence assuming flights 8861 and 8575 were confused on the ground, the similiar number of passengers contributing to the error.

Vietjet reported that the crew did not deem the weather at Dalat suitable for landing and therefore diverted to Cam Ranh Airport.
Following landing at Cam Ranh Airport VN-A692 flew to Dalat delivering the passengers to their destination, picking up the passengers waiting for the return flight VJ-8862 and returned to Hanoi now correctly transponding callsign VJC8862
avherald.com